Re: sarge->etch upgrade hits dependency hell
- From: hendrik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 17:05:05 -0500
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 03:30:47PM -0500, Sarunas Burdulis wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
hendrik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
After failing to reconstitute my etch system (details abundantlySound like what I have seen "as usual" while doing dist upgrades (Debian
available on this mailing list a few months ago), I wiped its partition
and tried to install etch form scratch using installer release candidate
one, only to find that lilo crashed when it was trying to make the
system bootable (installation report has been submitted).
So my next attempt was to copy the still-running sarge system I have on
another partition into my etch partition, and to try to upgrade the copy
to etch by changing /etc/apt/sources to read 'etch' where the old one
reads 'sarge', starting aptitude, and upgrading.
My first attempt was to try to upgrade aptitude first. No luck.
Trying to upgrading aptitude immediately led to hundreds of packages
that would be deleted. My guess is they were caught in the libc
transition.
My second attampt was to try 'U' so as to do a general upgrade. Again,
huge numbers of deleted packages, and a huge number of packages to be
installed, too. Went ahead with it anyway, after rescuing aptitude
itself -- it had decided it was appropriate to delete aptitude without
installing it again. But just typing '+' on aptitude was enough to
restore it without problem, so I don't know why it decided it was to be
removed in the first place.
After about three to four hours of downloading, it started the upgrades.
Several problems immediately. It couldn't upgrade fontconfig or pysol,
and refused to try further. pysol needed python2.4, don't know why it
decided to do that first. fontconfig is now unusable, which causes
troubles elsewhere.
After various attempts to solve the problems, I am left with a huge
number of packages to be deleted/upgraded/installed, and X that won't
work, and a list of 18 packages that have problems.
Should I try again tomorrow in the hope that package dependencies will
sort themselves out? Or should I just give up and try another way of
installing tomorrow? Can't think of one now, but one will probably come
to me it I think hard enough.
-- hendrik
and Ubuntu). Several apt-get {update|upgrade|dist-upgrade|-f install}
cycles often are needed. Some packages almost always get "stuck", i.e.
cannot be upgraded or prevent other packages to be upgraded. For those I
do apt-get remove and then install.
The hard part is to identify the key packages that are blocking all the
rest.
-- hendrik
Sarunas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFeHn3ejaFVltl6E8RAoNLAJ0ca2sy+0dmNDeWe1iXfs8R7v+TZgCfSSCH
76OdydxYco71W62XnUWadic=
=CigD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: sarge->etch upgrade hits dependency hell
- From: Gustavo Franco
- Re: sarge->etch upgrade hits dependency hell
- From: hendrik
- Re: sarge->etch upgrade hits dependency hell
- References:
- sarge->etch upgrade hits dependency hell
- From: hendrik
- Re: sarge->etch upgrade hits dependency hell
- From: Sarunas Burdulis
- sarge->etch upgrade hits dependency hell
- Prev by Date: Re: backup archive format saved to disk
- Next by Date: Re: backup archive format saved to disk
- Previous by thread: Re: sarge->etch upgrade hits dependency hell
- Next by thread: Re: sarge->etch upgrade hits dependency hell
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
