Re: using kmail with procmail
- From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2006 10:32:31 -0600
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 12/08/06 14:05, Micha Feigin wrote:
I couldn't find anything about this in google.
I currently have a working setup I like that uses fetchmail and procmail. I
thought of moving to kmail since it can do a few things that annoy me with
sylpheed. Is it possible to use kmail with a local maildir folder that is
handled be procmail and fetchmail or do I need to move everything into kmail
(which pretty much rules it out in such a case)?
You could drop them into the maildir and install an imapd and have
kmail fetch from there.
That way, you'll be totally independent of MUA, and can even set up
webmail if you want.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Is "common sense" really valid?
For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that
whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins
are mud people.
However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFeuUfS9HxQb37XmcRAkkTAJ9xInDRw7OYX6DshMPHNfpGGFL2qgCfdXd2
mAUfrDytFFIOpdhsXhzk2oQ=
=njno
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References:
- using kmail with procmail
- From: Micha Feigin
- using kmail with procmail
- Prev by Date: Re: using kmail with procmail
- Next by Date: Boot Debian from USB disk
- Previous by thread: Re: using kmail with procmail
- Next by thread: Re: using kmail with procmail
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
