Re: [OT/Sometimes Windows is better] Horrible GNOME File Picker (Was: Open (helper application chooser) for iceweasel/icedove is too simple)

On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:32:08 -0000
marc <gmane@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

For me Opus 8 is too bloated.

Bloated is one of those spurious apparent criticisms that doesn't
mean anything, though. In any case, why would anyone translate the
"bloat" when porting functions to Linux?

Maybe I misused the term, but I meant too many functions in program
that can make it slower and too complicated.

Total Commander (former Windows Commander) is much faster

In what way is Opus 8 slow? There's no lag in any file manager I've
used recently - except those that poll through directories to perform
"mime magic".

You are probably using current hw. Until recently I was running a
PIII-800. The difference between krusader and worker was obvious.

In any case, my comment was not about the "best" file manager on
Windows
- which is just another emacs vs vim debate - but the fact that the
Linux file managers could learn a lot from the mature file managers
on Windows. If Total Commander has functions worthy of borrowing,
then that's good too.

IMHO file managers on Windows are (sometimes) more developed because
(almost) nobody is using the shell. There are still lots of linux users
using *only* the shell for file managing, especially the more advanced
ones.

But I don't know what you mean by the two pane setup sentence.
Krusader has that by default.

As I said, I use Krusader, but its limited layout options is a good
example of what not to do, imo. IOW, a good example to learn from.

I think the best model in such cases is to use plugins as much as
possible. This way the user has the choice to install only the
functionality he really needs.

Regards,
Andrei
--
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
(Albert Einstein)


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Relevant Pages

  • Re: [OT/Sometimes Windows is better] Horrible GNOME File Picker (Was: Open (helper application choos
    ... but you can dig in when you have the inclination - like Linux :-) ... The difference between krusader and worker was obvious. ... Linux file managers could learn a lot from the mature file managers ... on Windows. ...
    (Debian-User)
  • Re: Flame Bait! Windows vs: The Unices
    ... It is done in a similar way as it is on Windows. ... Some file managers ... In reality this is actually more sophisticated on a Linux box than on ... file association with the metadata for the file on the HD. ...
    (comp.programming)
  • Re: network drag and drop
    ... Windows Exploder,er,explorer on the windows side, Konqueror on the ... linux side. ... I prefer Krusader to Konqueror personally, ... site-wide spam filters at catherders.com. ...
    (alt.os.linux.suse)
  • Re: Dir /w/s that also lists author
    ... there are of course windows ports of *nix ... for windows explorer, ... Great file managers. ... And it had a command line, ...
    (uk.comp.homebuilt)
  • Re: reiser4 plugins
    ... >> motherload of file managers and window systems and all. ... I guess that's why Apple doesn't want to make its X11 support too good. ... Otherwise the Mac world would get flooded with X11 programs that don't ... GNOME to Windows, then HAL would use the Windows way to interact with ...
    (Linux-Kernel)