Re: Ubuntu vs. Debian (was Re: Introduction)
- From: Alan Chandler <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 21:45:16 +0000
On Tuesday 13 February 2007 16:29, Miles Fidelman wrote:
FYI: Just for perspective, I'm also old enough to remember designing
control logic for film processors used for in preparing print the
old-fashioned way (you know, half-tone separations, prepared with
screens and cameras) - and, for that matter, laying out the PC boards
with black tape on acetate. Never used TeX or LaTeX, but used enough
runoff and troff (remember those :-) to prefer WYSIWIG editors for
short documents.
This whole discussion reminds me of my (software product development)
department in the 1980's. I had fought for, and succeeded, in getting
dumb terminals on everybody's desk connected through to a central Unix
system (Xenix from Microsoft - sold by the company I work for in the
UK, Logica) running on a PDP 11, where we had introduced version
control (SCCS and some modifications) to the software development
process.
in about 1982 I was in the market for a line printer so that my team
could print out their software listings and was pursuaded by the our HP
account manager to take a look at their new product - the HP Laserjet.
I was sold on the fact that we could get our printouts in A4 form for
the first time.
As soon as we had taken delivery of this, one of my senior developers
set up a series of nroff macros that made it very simple to create a
whole range of our companies standard documents in nearly perfect form
(company logo etc in header and footer - times fonts in the right size
and weight for all the different sections). Most of the rest of the
company were still using IBM electronic typewriters - and nobody really
understood how our department always produced such good AND STANDARD
documentation.
Unfortunately the one downside (which today would be handled by svg) was
the inability to include anything other than ascii art in embedded
diagrams - and eventually PCs on everyone's desk and Microsoft Word
took over and by about 1989 this documentation method died.
I no longer have anything to do with that area - but I would say today
that we still cannot produce documents with the consistency and
completeness (proper version control of all documentation, with the
version numbers automatically printed in the footer is just one such
example)
--
Alan Chandler
http://www.chandlerfamily.org.uk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ubuntu vs. Debian (was Re: Introduction)
- From: Ron Johnson
- Re: Ubuntu vs. Debian (was Re: Introduction)
- From: Roberto C. Sanchez
- Re: Ubuntu vs. Debian (was Re: Introduction)
- References:
- Introduction
- From: Joe Hart
- Re: Ubuntu vs. Debian (was Re: Introduction)
- From: Johannes Wiedersich
- Re: Ubuntu vs. Debian (was Re: Introduction)
- From: Miles Fidelman
- Introduction
- Prev by Date: Re: a dumb query? pls humor me
- Next by Date: Re: Woody on 486 problem
- Previous by thread: Re: Ubuntu vs. Debian (was Re: Introduction)
- Next by thread: Re: Ubuntu vs. Debian (was Re: Introduction)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|