Re: OT: a dumb query? pls humor me
- From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 16:22:06 -0600
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 02/26/07 15:21, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 02:08:24PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 02/26/07 13:55, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 09:36:51PM -0800, Freddy Freeloader wrote:[snip]
Paul Johnson wrote:
Michael Pobega wrote:
I wonder what burning a gallon of gas really costs? (I don't know, IWhatever the cost, it's irrelevant.
found a couple websites that suggest the true costs is somethinglike
$5-6/galloon, but they were out of date and from likely biased
sources).
It's an *excellent* source of transportable energy, and most of it's
secondary costs will either exist with other forms of burning liquid
fuel, or be transferred to different sources.
Agreed, somewhat, but I think its relevant to a discussion fo the costs of
gasoline. Gasoline's costs are artificially low when you look at the
deferred or external costs. Some other technologies *may* not
necesarily have as high deferred or external costs making their
initial higher costs not so bad. Its a matter of perception. Some
recent reading I'm doing (Our Angry Earth -- Asimov and Pournelle?)
talks about using renewable bio-fuels instead of fossil fuels. Part of
the argument is that renewable bio-fuels pull carbon, for example, out
of the air in their production and put it back cyclically. This means
that some of the external costs you see with fossil fuels aren't there
with the renewable bio-fuels. So their logic is that even though these
renewable bio-fuels are (were, written 1991 or so) more expensive at
the pump, their total cost, including external factors, is lower. How
valid all of that is, I don't know.
Bio-fuels *are* a great idea.
Until you realize *how much* gasoline & diesel this country uses
(then add 3x more to that for the rest of the world), and the fact
that stuff like corn ethanol needs lots of (*petrolem* based)
fertilizer.
(However, sugar cane ethanol in Brazil is a *great* idea, because of
cane's higher sugar density, Brazil's proximity to the equator and
lower population).
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFF412OS9HxQb37XmcRAkAJAKC3gm4fbaWh8XKj7YteSAVg3AqTAwCgrA1D
b4bKEoZn7QjNMTWVf4X9A3k=
=tUs5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bio-Based Fuels (OT: a dumb query? pls humor me)
- From: Greg Folkert
- Re: Bio-Based Fuels (OT: a dumb query? pls humor me)
- References:
- Re: a dumb query? pls humor me
- From: Andrew Sackville-West
- Re: a dumb query? pls humor me
- From: Paul Johnson
- Re: a dumb query? pls humor me
- From: Joe Hart
- Re: a dumb query? pls humor me
- From: Michael Pobega
- OT: a dumb query? pls humor me
- From: Kent West
- Re: OT: a dumb query? pls humor me
- From: Michael Pobega
- Re: OT: a dumb query? pls humor me
- From: Paul Johnson
- Re: OT: a dumb query? pls humor me
- From: Freddy Freeloader
- Re: OT: a dumb query? pls humor me
- From: Andrew Sackville-West
- Re: OT: a dumb query? pls humor me
- From: Ron Johnson
- Re: OT: a dumb query? pls humor me
- From: Andrew Sackville-West
- Re: a dumb query? pls humor me
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: sponge burning!
- Next by Date: Re: debian, package and other version info
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: a dumb query? pls humor me
- Next by thread: Re: Bio-Based Fuels (OT: a dumb query? pls humor me)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|