On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 09:55 -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
Ahh. That's what I was afraid of. Having ssh keys without a passphrase
is convenient, but very insecure. You are better off without the keys.
For the longest time I did not understand that, then some kind soul on
this list pointed to ssh-agent and keychain. Very minor inconvenience
(enter the passphrase once when you login), and *much* more secure.
Another great package is libpam-ssh, unlocking your ssh keys at login
time, meaning you will only need to type a password once.
Re: ssh ... You are better off without the keys.... For the longest time I did not understand that, ... unlocking your ssh keys at login... (Debian-User)
Re: I guess they cant revoke your soul for trying ... For the longest time, I always wondered why, and more importantly how, ...Bobby went about flashing his keys down on Main Street. ... (rec.music.gdead)
Re: ssh password problem ... using rsa public keys.... This keyword can be followed by a list of user name patterns,...Login is disallowed for user names that ... The allow/deny directives are processed in the following ... (Fedora)
RE: Single Sign On - Transfer of credential between webapps.... ... You'll want to provide your own values forthe keys.... > Change the loginUrl to be that of your login page. ... > Now, in your other applications (Webapp2 for example), you can get at the ... >> One of my website is used to login user: ... (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet)
Re: looking for a solution ..."Karolski" wrote in message ... > This is my first post here, so please, be patient. ... > (giving their password and login).... As far as security keys and web development go, I have a table of logins ... (comp.lang.java.programmer)
