Re: ssh
- From: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:24:37 -0500
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 10:43:23AM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 05:35:42PM +0100, Sven Arvidsson wrote:I think because this defends against outside attack. If you let someone
Another great package is libpam-ssh, unlocking your ssh keys at login
time, meaning you will only need to type a password once.
because I'm too lazy to research it, why is this any better than a
passwordless key? If someone is using your login then your ssh keys
are unlocked.
use your login (even if your keys have a passphrase) and you have them
loaded into ssh-agent, then you have the same problem.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: A Republican!!!!!! (was Re: OT: sponge burning!)
- Next by Date: Re: OT: sponge burning!
- Previous by thread: Re: ssh
- Next by thread: Re: ssh
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|