Re: OT: Here we go again.
- From: "s. keeling" <keeling@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 17:20:31 GMT
Steve Lamb <grey@xxxxxxxxx>:
s. keeling wrote:
Retaliation is not initiation. You are entirely within your rights to
defend yourself. You'd be a fool not to.
In fact one could argue it is morally reprehensible not to.
I agree, but we're certainly in the minority camp:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turn_the_other_cheek
--
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
(*) http://www.spots.ab.ca/~keeling Linux Counter #80292
- - http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html Please, don't Cc: me.
Spammers! http://www.spots.ab.ca/~keeling/emails.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: Here we go again.
- From: Al Eridani
- Re: OT: Here we go again.
- References:
- Re: OT: Here we go again.
- From: Curt Howland
- Re: OT: Here we go again.
- From: Roberto C. Sanchez
- Re: OT: Here we go again.
- From: s. keeling
- Re: OT: Here we go again.
- From: Steve Lamb
- Re: OT: Here we go again.
- Prev by Date: Is this a DoS attack?
- Next by Date: Re: Real and effective uid in setuid executable
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Here we go again.
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Here we go again.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
