Re: Best File System for partitions over 600GB
- From: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 18:15:14 -0400
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 10:42:45PM +0100, Mathias Brodala wrote:
Hi Roberto.
Roberto C. Sanchez, 12.03.2007 21:07:
There is a ton of information about JFS and XFS on the net. All you
need to do is check the Wikipedia filesystem comparison page or Google
search for filesystem comparisons. The short of it is:
ext3 - good general purpose FS (not the best performance, but stable)
xfs - excellent performance with huge files and huge filesystems
jfs - similar to XFS but I think it has better performance when under
heavy I/O load
Could you define 'huge files' and 'huge filesystems'? Can you give me some numbers?
At work we deal with files of size 1 GB to 100 GB on a regular basis. I
would classify those as large. XFS supports files up to a size of 8
exabytes and filesystems also of size 8 exabytes. I am not sure of the
limitations on JFS.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Best File System for partitions over 600GB
- From: Ron Johnson
- Re: Best File System for partitions over 600GB
- From: Mathias Brodala
- Re: Best File System for partitions over 600GB
- References:
- Re: Best File System for partitions over 600GB
- From: Douglas Allan Tutty
- Re: Best File System for partitions over 600GB
- From: Roberto C. Sanchez
- Re: Best File System for partitions over 600GB
- From: Mike McCarty
- Re: Best File System for partitions over 600GB
- From: Roberto C. Sanchez
- Re: Best File System for partitions over 600GB
- From: Mathias Brodala
- Re: Best File System for partitions over 600GB
- Prev by Date: Re: Best File System for partitions over 600GB
- Next by Date: NFS-lock after cold reboot
- Previous by thread: Re: Best File System for partitions over 600GB
- Next by thread: Re: Best File System for partitions over 600GB
- Index(es):