Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: Celejar <celejar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 09:28:14 -0400
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:09:29 +0200
galevsky@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Is it possible to know why the reply-to field is not set to
debian-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for each mail coming from the ML ? I am quite
sure you have discussed it before, but I am relatively new to this ML. When
you used not to take care about replying -it is the case in lots of ml, e.g.
gentoo'- it is very disappointing to see your replies to be sent out to the
last sender and not the whole list.
Thks for your answer.
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
I haven't been through it carefully, but this is what people bring up.
Celejar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References:
- [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: galevsky
- [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- Prev by Date: Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- Next by Date: RE: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- Previous by thread: Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- Next by thread: RE: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
