Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 08:27:27 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 03/30/07 08:09, galevsky@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Is it possible to know why the reply-to field is not set to
debian-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:debian-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> for
each mail coming from the ML ? I am quite sure you have discussed it
before, but I am relatively new to this ML. When you used not to take
care about replying -it is the case in lots of ml, e.g. gentoo'- it is
very disappointing to see your replies to be sent out to the last sender
and not the whole list.
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
Icedove (with the appropriate plugin), Evolution, KMail & mutt all
do Reply-to-list.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGDRA/S9HxQb37XmcRAoRPAJ92DN+wKl2F/4zIxVX+9dJXE+A7MgCfZwRg
OXN1muAcsZQCoxPn5YFKZyA=
=oeGW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References:
- [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: galevsky
- [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- Prev by Date: Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- Next by Date: Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- Previous by thread: Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- Next by thread: Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|