RE: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: galevsky@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:32:54 +0200
I am forwarding previous answers.... and adding that I do not want to pop
these mails since I suscribed lots of ML, not only debian ones, and it is
more convenient for me to read&write from gmail than poping 3 times (work -
home - laptop) thousands of mails.....
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: galevsky@xxxxxxxxx <galevsky@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 30 mars 2007 15:28
Subject: Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
To: Kevin Mark <kevin.mark@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Okay, thks for your answer. I still can't see any advantage not to fill in
reply-to, but.... I can live with reply-to-all ;o)
Rgds
Gal'
2007/3/30, Kevin Mark < kevin.mark@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 03:09:29PM +0200, galevsky@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Is it possible to know why the reply-to field is not set to
> debian-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for each mail coming from the ML ? I am
quite sure
> you have discussed it before, but I am relatively new to this ML. When
you used
> not to take care about replying -it is the case in lots of ml, e.g.
gentoo'- it
> is very disappointing to see your replies to be sent out to the last
sender and
> not the whole list.
Yes this is a feature. Most folks like myself have a MUA (mail client)
that has a 'reply to list' feature, that replys ONLY to the list. Other
clients require you to use 'reply to all' and then remove yourself etc.
This is issue is discussed about every 6 months by new folks to the
list. I'm sure if you google with 'site:list.debian.org reply to list',
you may find the numerous threads on this subject.
--
| .''`. == Debian GNU/Linux == | my web site: |
| : :' : The Universal |mysite.verizon.net/kevin.mark/|
| `. `' Operating System | go to counter.li.org and |
| `- http://www.debian.org/ | be counted! #238656 |
| my keyserver: subkeys.pgp.net | my NPO: cfsg.org |
|join the new debian-community.org to help Debian! |
|_______ Unless I ask to be CCd, assume I am subscribed _______|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGDQ1Vv8UcC1qRZVMRAo6nAJ491ZXVtElaJTjca7z7j4sUgKRydgCdGrU2
tao4x8D7ia0SfBZOUn8CWJo=
=a28L
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: Ron Johnson
- Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- References:
- [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: galevsky
- [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- Prev by Date: Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- Next by Date: Re: simple image upload server to coexist with wiki?
- Previous by thread: Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- Next by thread: Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|