Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 09:06:13 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 03/30/07 08:32, galevsky@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
I am forwarding previous answers.... and adding that I do not want to
pop these mails since I suscribed lots of ML, not only debian ones, and
it is more convenient for me to read&write from gmail than poping 3
times (work - home - laptop) thousands of mails.....
Complain to Google that their MUA is lacking an important feature.
Reply-to-list
OR
IMAP functionality.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGDRlVS9HxQb37XmcRAgGSAKCWVYu9W235eJVQN6vJ3ymOTUTOvgCgoFDu
dK5/AdxnWKDSdZ9GY969Vv4=
=kFoy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: Seth Goodman
- Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: galevsky
- RE: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- References:
- [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: galevsky
- RE: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: galevsky
- [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Woohooo! Dell + Linux
- Next by Date: Re: a dumb query? pls humor me
- Previous by thread: RE: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- Next by thread: Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|