Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: Raquel <raquel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 08:10:12 -0700
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 16:58:10 +0200
galevsky@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
tried to think that it
was the reason why we don't have it in debian ML. But I totally
disagree with it.
Why do we have to have this argument every month? It doesn't matter
if you disagree or not! This is the way this list is, so you accept
it and live with it or you don't. You make the choice. Why do I
have to put up with your whining about it?
--
Raquel
============================================================
Say nothing of my religion. It is known to my god and myself alone.
--Thomas Jefferson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References:
- [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: galevsky
- RE: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: galevsky
- Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: Ron Johnson
- Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: galevsky
- [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Woohooo! Dell + Linux
- Next by Date: Re: Woohooo! Dell + Linux
- Previous by thread: Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- Next by thread: Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|