Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 17:35:46 +0200
On 30.03.07 16:58, galevsky@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
? it missed something.... we are talking about adding Reply-to to ML, not to
day-to-day emails.
it is just the thing considered harmful. Get an e-mail client that supports
List-Reply feature. Mailing list manager should not decide who to send
replies to. It's up to the sender of e-mail to specify where (s)he wishes
replies should be sent to and up to the replier to decide who it will send
reply to, list, sender or both.
It is a wrong way not to take the use into
consideration: most of the replies are done to the ML, so we can easily
consider replying to the whole ML as a default behaviour.
Yes, it is.
In very particular cases, when you don't want to share, you can do the
cut/paste effort to target only one contributor, can't you ? So what's
broken ?
The reasoning of people who want Reply-To being set up. The mailers who do
not know about mailing lists.
...this should be mentioned in mailing lists FAQ, if there is any...
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Quantum mechanics: The dreams stuff is made of.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References:
- [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: galevsky
- RE: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: galevsky
- Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: Ron Johnson
- Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: galevsky
- [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Woohooo! Dell + Linux
- Next by Date: Re: Woohooo! Dell + Linux
- Previous by thread: Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- Next by thread: Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|