Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:09:32 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 03/30/07 14:09, Seth Goodman wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote on Friday, March 30, 2007 9:06 AM -0500:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 03/30/07 08:32, galevsky@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
I am forwarding previous answers.... and adding that I do not wantComplain to Google that their MUA is lacking an important feature.
to pop these mails since I suscribed lots of ML, not only debian
ones, and it is more convenient for me to read&write from gmail
than poping 3 times (work - home - laptop) thousands of mails.....
It's only important to the Debian mailing lists and a small number of
others. It's not important to the majority of other mailing lists, and
that's probably why Google and many others don't bother supporting that
function.
It's like using MSFT. If all you've ever known is a buggy malware-
filled OS, and you've been conditioned to grab your ankles, crying
"Thank you Mr Gates, may I have another!" then you don't know any
better.
We, however, know that just because Joe User doesn't know any
better, it doesn't mean that there is nothing better.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGDW58S9HxQb37XmcRAhJ2AKChsd5BY6phUXlyBid3iIKqCPlOXwCfW7pL
eusbprzbslq4P7SHtTHaeBQ=
=2vQv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: Greg Folkert
- Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- References:
- RE: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: Seth Goodman
- RE: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- Prev by Date: Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- Next by Date: Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- Previous by thread: RE: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- Next by thread: Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|