Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 22:30:38 +0200
On 03/30/07 08:32, galevsky@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
I am forwarding previous answers.... and adding that I do not want
to pop these mails since I suscribed lots of ML, not only debian
ones, and it is more convenient for me to read&write from gmail
than poping 3 times (work - home - laptop) thousands of mails.....
Ron Johnson wrote on Friday, March 30, 2007 9:06 AM -0500:
Complain to Google that their MUA is lacking an important feature.
On 30.03.07 14:09, Seth Goodman wrote:
It's only important to the Debian mailing lists and a small number of
others. It's not important to the majority of other mailing lists, and
that's probably why Google and many others don't bother supporting that
function.
It's important nearly WHEREVER mailing lists are. Mailing list headers are
defined in RFC2369 and are made to give users flexibility.
Telling tkat someone does not need them is silly as person with bad sight
telling (s)he doesn't need eye-glasses because (s)he doesn't know what it
is.
The whole fact that "majority" of other mailing lists and their users does
not know about this does not mean it's useless.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Support bacteria - they're the only culture some people have.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: Seth Goodman
- RE: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- References:
- Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: Ron Johnson
- RE: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: Seth Goodman
- Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- Prev by Date: Bread (was Re: Woohooo! Dell + Linux)
- Next by Date: Re: Woohooo! Dell + Linux
- Previous by thread: Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- Next by thread: RE: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|