Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: galevsky@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 01:05:34 +0200
Okay guys,
so, just to calm down,
I never told you what to do. I just faced twice the problem of answering to
the wrong addressee, and I saw that it happens sometimes to others. I
listened to your proposal of using a MUA, then argued that it was not
suiting my needs. (I don't think just about me, of course I really know you
don't care about my personal issues, but I am talking about general ones in
order to adapt to the most needs). As I said in the beginning, I doubt if I
were the first guy to ask you for that..... Celejar gave me a link that may
explain why reply-to usage is bad, and I -verry sorry for that- gave my
point of view, but please note that I did not tell you what you have to do.
Thanks for your attention.
Gal'
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: Ron Johnson
- Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- References:
- Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: Joe Hart
- RE: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: Seth Goodman
- Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: Roberto C. Sánchez
- Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: Joe Hart
- Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- Prev by Date: Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- Next by Date: Re: Woohooo! Dell + Linux
- Previous by thread: Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- Next by thread: Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|