Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: Andrei Popescu <andreimpopescu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 16:18:33 +0300
galevsky@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
2007/3/31, Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@xxxxxxx>:
Noobie stomps in, uses HTML mail (which you are *still* doing, and
still breaking the Code Of Conduct) and tells us not to follow an
internet standard, because no one else does it.
That's not appreciated.
Sorry for the previous html message, I though gmail used html only
when messages contained extra formatting info, but it was not the
case. Very sorry. Now it should be better...
Gal'
It is indeed. Welcome to the our club. You might consider sorting d-u
to its own folder as the large volume of mails can be difficult to
handle otherwise.
If you ever start using gmail through pop/smtp search the archives for
the issues that *will* arise. Unfortunately gmail's ways of handling
mail are not very orthodox.
Regards,
Andrei
--
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
(Albert Einstein)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References:
- Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: Joe Hart
- RE: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: Seth Goodman
- Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: Roberto C. Sánchez
- Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: Joe Hart
- Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: galevsky
- Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: Ron Johnson
- Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: galevsky
- Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Information about Etch updates.
- Next by Date: looking for email database
- Previous by thread: Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- Next by thread: Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
