Re: Which OS? Was "I do consider Ubuntu to be Debian" , Ian Murdock
- From: Joe Hart <j.hart@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 19:39:09 +0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 05:41:45AM -0700, Michael M. wrote:
On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 16:42 -0400, Michael Pobega wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 11:35:02AM -0700, Michael M. wrote:
If Debian worried about sticking to a schedule rather than worryingWhich begs the question, "Is Debian made for me?"
about the stability of the product, you'd hear about a few more
missing astronauts and a couple of billion dollars gone from (I'm
going on a limb here) some bank data centers. Obviously this is all
worst case scenario, but it's what Debian is primarily made for.
What has made Debian a great fit for me over the past months is its
beefed up efforts to make testing a more viable option for users (for
example, by providing security updates for testing). I started using
Etch some months ago, perhaps close to a year ago, pulling in just a few
packages from unstable, and it has been a great fit for me. Until the
past few months, when it has increasingly come to seem stale to me.
It's only natural, then, for me to question whether *I* really fit in
with your definition of "We the Debian people."
Why don't we reframe this as: What is the best OS/Distro for Michael?
Perhaps you have some conflicting needs that requires a non-standard
answer? I _think_ that what I hear that you want is:
More recent software than what is in stable or testing (when its
frozen).
Less dynamic than Sid
What about:
Debian stable or testing to run your hardware with a *buntu in a
chroot? Gives you a base OS that won't crash but more recent
software.
Is Linux for you? What about one of the BSDs? I've been looking at
OpenBSD; they release every 6 months (their Release is like Debian's
Stable), with security update (source patches) as necessary. Following
every security update even if it doesn't apply to you, you end up
running their Stable. Their Current is like Debian's Sid.
They can release every 6 months because they only focus on the main OS.
Third-party stuff (upstream) is in packages (binary) and ports (source
tarballs pre-tweaked to compile properly on a given release level).
Using the ports and packages system is supposed to be similar to
using aptitude from the command line. It brings in whatever
dependancies there are, compiles anything required, and installs it.
It also will uninstall.
It sounds to me like this may be a viable option for you:
Stable, reliable, OS
Upgraded every 6 months
Fairly recent third-party software.
So tell us what your ideal OS would be and do. There's enough cross-OS
experience on this list to give good suggestions.
I'm not marking this thread as OT since a discussion on why Debian may
not be working for someone, and what a user's needs are, is important
for Debian folks. So lets _not_ have a flame fest. Lets help a debian
user with a fundamental problem: his OS isn't doing what he needs it to
do.
Very eloquent Doug. I agree completely with you.
If someone is looking for recent software, and stability, then Lenny
might be an option when it comes out, but until it does, Etch might be
the best fit. Sid is not "frozen" as Etch is, but is very cold at the
moment, so even Sid does not offer the newest software like it should.
For example, OOo is 2.04 in Sid, while 2.1 has been "stable" for months
and 2.2 just released.
The problem with Ubuntu is that while it is based on Debian, several key
items are different (restricted modules, sudo/root, etc.) to make it not
appealing to many Debian purists. Sidux on the other hand offers 100%
compatibility with Debian, and some really smart people helping smooth
any bumps one might experience with it. Sidux is Sid, with a custom
kernel and a few really good scripts.
For Debian people who might be afraid of running Sid, Sidux might be
just the answer that they were looking for. However, I would have to
admit that it might be dangerous, and Etch is the safe bet. It might
not have the latest packages, but it will work as promised.
Joe
- --
Registerd Linux user #443289 at http://counter.li.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGDpy9iXBCVWpc5J4RAvNuAJ9FipiFijIQhSP5xqy0dRlA640XEgCglOQv
JgKpeJOnevlDyWt00abfg8U=
=ZKxr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Which OS?
- From: Douglas Allan Tutty
- Re: Which OS? Was "I do consider Ubuntu to be Debian" , Ian Murdock
- From: Michael M.
- Re: Which OS? Was "I do consider Ubuntu to be Debian" , Ian Murdock
- From: Greg Folkert
- Re: Which OS?
- References:
- Re: "I do consider Ubuntu to be Debian" , Ian Murdock
- From: Michael Pobega
- Re: "I do consider Ubuntu to be Debian" , Ian Murdock
- From: Nik
- Re: "I do consider Ubuntu to be Debian" , Ian Murdock
- From: Michael Pobega
- Re: "I do consider Ubuntu to be Debian" , Ian Murdock
- From: Nik
- Re: "I do consider Ubuntu to be Debian" , Ian Murdock
- From: Michael Pobega
- Re: "I do consider Ubuntu to be Debian" , Ian Murdock
- From: Michael M.
- Re: "I do consider Ubuntu to be Debian" , Ian Murdock
- From: Chris Bannister
- Re: "I do consider Ubuntu to be Debian" , Ian Murdock
- From: Michael M.
- Re: "I do consider Ubuntu to be Debian" , Ian Murdock
- From: Michael Pobega
- Re: "I do consider Ubuntu to be Debian" , Ian Murdock
- From: Michael M.
- Which OS? Was "I do consider Ubuntu to be Debian" , Ian Murdock
- From: Douglas Allan Tutty
- Re: "I do consider Ubuntu to be Debian" , Ian Murdock
- Prev by Date: I have a problem with my harddisc
- Next by Date: Re: xine: no plugin for MRL
- Previous by thread: Which OS? Was "I do consider Ubuntu to be Debian" , Ian Murdock
- Next by thread: Re: Which OS? Was "I do consider Ubuntu to be Debian" , Ian Murdock
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|