Re: Which OS? Was "I do consider Ubuntu to be Debian" , Ian Murdock

On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 19:39 +0200, Joe Hart wrote:
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 05:41:45AM -0700, Michael M. wrote:
On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 16:42 -0400, Michael Pobega wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 11:35:02AM -0700, Michael M. wrote:

If Debian worried about sticking to a schedule rather than
worrying
about the stability of the product, you'd hear about a few more
missing astronauts and a couple of billion dollars gone from (I'm
going on a limb here) some bank data centers. Obviously this is
all
worst case scenario, but it's what Debian is primarily made for.
Which begs the question, "Is Debian made for me?"


What has made Debian a great fit for me over the past months is its
beefed up efforts to make testing a more viable option for users
(for
example, by providing security updates for testing). I started
using
Etch some months ago, perhaps close to a year ago, pulling in just
a few
packages from unstable, and it has been a great fit for me. Until
the
past few months, when it has increasingly come to seem stale to me.
It's only natural, then, for me to question whether *I* really fit
in
with your definition of "We the Debian people."


Why don't we reframe this as: What is the best OS/Distro for
Michael?

Perhaps you have some conflicting needs that requires a non-standard
answer? I _think_ that what I hear that you want is:

More recent software than what is in stable or testing (when its
frozen).

Less dynamic than Sid

What about:

Debian stable or testing to run your hardware with a *buntu in a
chroot? Gives you a base OS that won't crash but more recent
software.

Is Linux for you? What about one of the BSDs? I've been looking at
OpenBSD; they release every 6 months (their Release is like Debian's
Stable), with security update (source patches) as necessary.
Following
every security update even if it doesn't apply to you, you end up
running their Stable. Their Current is like Debian's Sid.

They can release every 6 months because they only focus on the main
OS.
Third-party stuff (upstream) is in packages (binary) and ports
(source
tarballs pre-tweaked to compile properly on a given release level).
Using the ports and packages system is supposed to be similar to
using aptitude from the command line. It brings in whatever
dependancies there are, compiles anything required, and installs it.
It also will uninstall.

It sounds to me like this may be a viable option for you:

Stable, reliable, OS

Upgraded every 6 months

Fairly recent third-party software.

So tell us what your ideal OS would be and do. There's enough
cross-OS
experience on this list to give good suggestions.

I'm not marking this thread as OT since a discussion on why Debian
may
not be working for someone, and what a user's needs are, is
important
for Debian folks. So lets _not_ have a flame fest. Lets help a
debian
user with a fundamental problem: his OS isn't doing what he needs it
to
do.

Very eloquent Doug. I agree completely with you.

If someone is looking for recent software, and stability, then Lenny
might be an option when it comes out, but until it does, Etch might be
the best fit. Sid is not "frozen" as Etch is, but is very cold at the
moment, so even Sid does not offer the newest software like it should.
For example, OOo is 2.04 in Sid, while 2.1 has been "stable" for
months
and 2.2 just released.

Xfce is also much newer than in sid or etch. Perhaps you'd be interested
to know about experimental. GNOME in experimental has crept up to 2.18.
2.2 OO.o has rc stuff right now, a bit buggy due to mixed RCs, but very
soon 2.2 released will be there. Xfce is at v4.4 and is very nicely
shaped up.

The problem with Ubuntu is that while it is based on Debian, several
key
items are different (restricted modules, sudo/root, etc.) to make it
not
appealing to many Debian purists.

There are other reasons Debian purists don't like Ubuntu. Me, I don't
like it because of the importance of Deadlines, though with an RC
process, but not without a bunch of compromises that hurt it badly in
many instances. Such that upgrade *sometimes* can be a serious headache.
Having had to fix quite a few upgrades gone wrong with Ubuntu, I get the
bad parts much more.

I see the biggest problem, people NOT wanting to test the upgrade
process as the releases aren't very long between them. This then brings
out the "missed" bugs, especially with regards to "non-main" packages
and 3rd party "non-universe/multiverse". Screamers, scream "5UXX0RZ",
not realizing that they screwed themselves going outside the system. But
still blame others.

Debian reduces this, as 19,000+ packages encompass most of those
problems Ubuntu experience. Even with 3rd party things like
"Debian-Multimedia" actually use buildd exactly (well almost exactly)
like the Debian proper does.

Sidux on the other hand offers 100% compatibility with Debian, and
some really smart people helping smooth any bumps one might experience
with it. Sidux is Sid, with a custom kernel and a few really good
scripts.

I'd like to see most of those improvements make it back into Debian.
They are compatible, though *some* of the kernel whacks aren't.

For Debian people who might be afraid of running Sid, Sidux might be
just the answer that they were looking for. However, I would have to
admit that it might be dangerous, and Etch is the safe bet. It might
not have the latest packages, but it will work as promised.

I have to say that as an experienced Sid (with experimental sprinkled in
regularly) user for many years, if you are scared to run Sid... "Grow
some hair on your chest, that includes the women!"

No, really, Sid typically isn't for the faint of heart. A few weeks
after Etch release, Sid is gonna be a bumpy ride for a month or more.

"To infinity^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^HLenny... and beyond!"
--
greg, greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Novell's Directory Services is a competitive product to Microsoft's
Active Directory in much the same way that the Saturn V is a competitive
product to those dinky little model rockets that kids light off down at
the playfield. -- Thane Walkup


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Relevant Pages

  • Re: catch-22 upgrade (FYI)
    ... Etch (or Sid). ... I initially set out to upgrade to Etch, ... When trying to install the 2.6.15 kernel image, ...
    (Debian-User)
  • Re: catch-22 upgrade (FYI)
    ... Etch (or Sid). ... I initially set out to upgrade to Etch, ... When trying to install the 2.6.15 kernel image, ...
    (Debian-User)
  • Re: command-line utility to write/edit iptc info?
    ... Upgrade to Etch or Sid. ... When the debian page says 'depends on such and such other packages', ... aren't they going to mess my sarge install? ...
    (Debian-User)
  • Re: Which OS?
    ... Sid is not "frozen" as Etch is, but is very cold at the ... so even Sid does not offer the newest software like it should. ... The problem with Ubuntu is that while it is based on Debian, ... it started to get covered by the Debian Security Team. ...
    (Debian-User)
  • Re: open-ssh keypair Auth
    ... Hash: SHA1 ... Hi, i've got a whole bunch of linux machines (mainly debian, with etch, ... testing, sid, and a frankenstein machine with mental pinning). ... Default debian install normally alows this and i have not changed the config ...
    (Debian-User)