Re: keeping tar quiet in script
- From: Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 16:22:13 -0400
On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 05:01:31PM -0300, Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto wrote:
The latter is POSIX-compliant. I believe that the "&>" notation is a
What about the classical "1> /dev/null 2>&1"?
This probably has identical behavior identical to &> /dev/null, but is
longer to type.
&>/dev/null seems less portable. Here I have bash and dash, and &>/dev/null
does not work under dash. "1> /dev/null 2>&1" works everywhere.
bashism.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- References:
- keeping tar quiet in script
- From: Peter Teunissen
- Re: keeping tar quiet in script
- From: Pierre THIERRY
- Re: keeping tar quiet in script
- From: Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto
- keeping tar quiet in script
- Prev by Date: Re: keeping tar quiet in script
- Next by Date: Re: Which OS? Was "I do consider Ubuntu to be Debian" , Ian Murdock
- Previous by thread: Re: keeping tar quiet in script
- Next by thread: Re: keeping tar quiet in script
- Index(es):