Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: Bob Cox <news@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 13:46:05 +0100
In article <20070331110259.GA20760@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This is not about MTAs and SMTP here. This is about e-mail headers and MUAs.
That's a large enough hurdle that I think it safe to say the horse
has left the barn on this one a long time ago. Continuing to insist
that things _should_ have been different, long past the point where
that is feasible, only makes us look foolish. In that, we have been
successful.
This thread started with complaining about non-existent Reply-To: headers
set by the list. Some people, including me, say that there are much better
ways to solve the mailing list reply problem.
Maybe you should read this thread again.
Forgive me if I am missing something obvious, but I read this list as a
newsgroup via gmane. This means I can use a 'proper' usenet news
client, slrn in my case, which seems so much easier to use than any MUA
I can think of. But YMMV of course.
--
Bob Cox. Stoke Gifford, near Bristol, UK.
Debian on NSLU2: http://slug.bobcox.com/
http://pippin.co.uk/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- From: Brad Rogers
- Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Debian User List
- Next by Date: Re: GPG and Signing
- Previous by thread: RE: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- Next by thread: Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
