Re: Desktop user: Etch or the next testing?
- From: Wei Chen <wchenhk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 16:50:33 +0800
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jochen Schulz wrote:
If you are unsure, stick with etch for at least its first couple of
months as a stable release. Unstable and the new testing ("lenny") will
most probably suffer from a little breakage here and there since a lot
of changes will be pulled in at the same time. If you haven't
experienced this before, lean back and learn from other people's cries
for help on this list. :)
J.
It sounds like a good idea not to upgrade for a while and wait to see
the feedback of other people first.
But I once heard that things in the "Testing" distribution always change
gradually. And the big gap between stable and testing will cause the
upgrade not so easy after some time of the release of stable. Is that true?
- --
Cheers,
Wei Chen
http://www.acplex.com/people/wchen/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGEMPZCIqXQV6BF28RAmFaAKCUZssZsK9cKaNIBRUF1AdDKlAKqQCfSuOT
WHLZR8On72XKuCKODmiWYDo=
=Ka8D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Desktop user: Etch or the next testing?
- From: Jochen Schulz
- Re: Desktop user: Etch or the next testing?
- References:
- Desktop user: Etch or the next testing?
- From: Wei Chen
- Re: Desktop user: Etch or the next testing?
- From: Jochen Schulz
- Desktop user: Etch or the next testing?
- Prev by Date: Re: [ML ISSUE] reply-to field ?
- Next by Date: Re: dreamweaver-esque webpage design program?
- Previous by thread: Re: Desktop user: Etch or the next testing?
- Next by thread: Re: Desktop user: Etch or the next testing?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
