Re: GPL v3?
- From: John Hasler <jhasler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 13:11:50 -0500
Joe writes:
Mainly the difference is that v3 has clauses to prevent people from
restricting users what they can do with things that the software makes,
such as putting DRM in media.
It also attempts to limit enforcement of their patents. It is so complex
as to be very difficult to understand. It will be completely
incomprehensible to those who struggle with GPLv2.
I am not exactly sure how these companies justify doing what they do
with code that is under the GPL, but they do it none the less. AFAIK,
they add functionality to the code then refuse to release the source
code...
If you know of such instances contact the copyright owners so that they can
take appropriate action.
I will not metion names because I don't want to get slapped with a law
suit.
So you are not sure of your facts.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: GPL v3?
- From: Joe Hart
- Re: GPL v3?
- References:
- GPL v3?
- From: Douglas Allan Tutty
- Re: GPL v3?
- From: Michael Pobega
- Re: GPL v3?
- From: John Hasler
- Re: GPL v3?
- From: Douglas Allan Tutty
- Re: GPL v3?
- From: John Hasler
- Re: GPL v3?
- From: Greg Folkert
- Re: GPL v3?
- From: Douglas Allan Tutty
- Re: GPL v3?
- From: Misko
- Re: GPL v3?
- From: Joe Hart
- GPL v3?
- Prev by Date: Re: Uninstall (nearly) everything installed after spacific date
- Next by Date: mixing syanptic and aptitude
- Previous by thread: Re: GPL v3?
- Next by thread: Re: GPL v3?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|