Re: Gnash issues which package needs a bug report?
- From: Andrew Sackville-West <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 11:06:32 -0700
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 07:41:49AM +0100, Ananda Samaddar wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using AMD64 Lenny and I notice a minor issue with the gnash mozilla
plugin. Basically the mozilla-plugin-gnash package install the plugin
in /usr/lib/firefox/plugins . In this location Iceweasel doesn't
recognise it and 'about:config' has no information about Gnash. If I copy
libgnashplugin.so from /usr/lib/firefox/plugins
to /usr/lib/iceweasel/plugins then it works and is recognised.
Is this a bug in the Iceweasel package that should create a symlink
from the Firefox plugin directory to the Iceweasel one or should the
Gnash plugin package install to the Iceweasel plugin directory? I had
a look at the BTS for both the Iceweasel and mozilla-plugin-gnash
packages and didn't see the issue(s) mentioned.
IMO, you should file it against mozilla-plugin-gnash. With iceweasel
as the debian-approved version of firefox, then the debian package for
firefox plugins should put the plugin somewhere useful. but, I am no
DD, that's just
.02
A
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- References:
- Gnash issues which package needs a bug report?
- From: Ananda Samaddar
- Gnash issues which package needs a bug report?
- Prev by Date: Re: Fetchmail Problems
- Next by Date: Re: Sudo instead of SU
- Previous by thread: Gnash issues which package needs a bug report?
- Next by thread: Re: Gnash issues which package needs a bug report?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
