Re: SSH versus SSHFS
- From: Paul Johnson <baloo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:46:08 -0700
Karl E. Jorgensen wrote in Article
<20070426172855.GD13589@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> posted to
gmane.linux.debian.user:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 09:55:02AM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 09:10:53AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 04/26/07 08:35, Masatran, R. Deepak wrote:
To work with a remote computer over a slow internet connection, which
is better: SSH or SSHFS? Of course it depends on the situation, but
in what situation is each better?
You are asking "Which is better: apples or rocks?". Neither are
"better", since each has a different *purpose*.
clearly rocks are better as they can be used to get apples. ;-P
And apples keep those strange doctors at bay: An apple a day keeps the
doctor away. (If you can hit him). No mention of PCs though...
So will a rock if you can throw it at the doctor hard enough.
--
Paul Johnson
Email and IM (XMPP & Google Talk): baloo@xxxxxxxxx
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References:
- SSH versus SSHFS
- From: Masatran, R. Deepak
- Re: SSH versus SSHFS
- From: Ron Johnson
- Re: SSH versus SSHFS
- From: Andrew Sackville-West
- Re: SSH versus SSHFS
- From: Karl E. Jorgensen
- SSH versus SSHFS
- Prev by Date: Re: Whats happened to my psuedo ttys
- Next by Date: Re: Mailing List vs Newsgroup
- Previous by thread: Re: SSH versus SSHFS
- Next by thread: Re: SSH versus SSHFS
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
