Re: RAM 95% used
- From: Celejar <celejar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:58:55 -0400
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 21:26:19 -0400
Douglas Allan Tutty <dtutty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]
I think he said Celeron (doesn't that mean slow as celery, i.e.
low-power?), 256 MB and no swap.
Modern Celerons (I have one, but nothing else modern to compare it to),
i.e. the Celeron M, are apparently exactly the same as their Pentium M
brethren (but not, I guess, the various Cores) except for a) smaller
cache and b) reduced power saving functionality (IIUC, they're the
identical chips with those two features disabled).
[snip]
Celejar
--
mailmin.sourceforge.net - remote access via secure (OpenPGP) email
ssuds.sourceforge.net - A Simple Sudoku Solver and Generator
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References:
- RAM 95% used
- From: somethin2cool
- Re: RAM 95% used
- From: Jostein Elvaker Haande
- Re: RAM 95% used
- From: somethin2cool
- Re: RAM 95% used
- From: Roberto C. Sánchez
- Re: RAM 95% used
- From: Andreas Janssen
- Re: RAM 95% used
- From: Douglas Allan Tutty
- RAM 95% used
- Prev by Date: Re: aptitude "check" command?
- Next by Date: Re: Question about LVM on Debian
- Previous by thread: Re: RAM 95% used
- Next by thread: an't create VMware XP client on Etch host (keymap problem?)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
