Re: mounting LVM partitions fails after etch upgrade
- From: "David Fuchs" <php4flicks@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 14:26:52 +0200
dear all,
a while back I posted to this list because my file systems on LVM over
RAID1 would not mount cleanly anymore after upgrade from sarge to
etch. this weekend I had time to poke around in the data on both the
disks, and found out what was wrong.
as it turns out, since almost a year, *no* data at all was written to
one of the disks!! that didn't stop mdadm from happily reporting that
everything with the array was in perfect order, though. I rebooted the
system a few times during this period, and not even when assembling
the array it complained about anything.
due to the upgrade of mdadm, it seems that the s/w raid started using
both disks again, and by writing data to the 'old' disk, corrupting
some of the out-of-date data there. I'm glad I didn't try to fix this
with fsck, it probably would have completely toasted the data on both
disks.
how can such a catastrophic failure of a raid array happen, and worse,
go completely unnoticed? I don't think it's a config issue, it
perfectly mirrored all data before that point. both disks are
physically perfect, not a single bad block.
cheers,
- Dave.
On 5/6/07, Douglas Allan Tutty <dtutty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 03:25:02PM +0200, David Fuchs wrote:
> I have just upgraded my sarge system to etch, following exactly the upgrade
> instructions at http://www.us.debian.org/releases/etch/i386/release-notes/.
>
> now my system does not boot correctly anymore... I'm using RAID1 with two
> disks, / is on md0 and all other mounts (/home/, /var, /usr etc) are on md1
> using LVM.
>
> the first problem is that during boot, only md0 gets started. I can get
> around this by specifying break=mount on the kernel boot line and manually
> starting md1, but where need I change what so that md1 gets started at this
> point as well?
>
> after manually starting md1 and continuing to boot, I get errors like
>
> Inode 184326 has illegal block(s)
> /var: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY (i.e. without the -a or -o
> options)
>
> ... same for all other partitions on that volume group
>
> fsck died with exit status 4
> A log is being saved in /var/log/fsck/checkfs if that location is
> writable.(it is not)
>
> at this point I get dropped to a maintenance shell. when I select to
> continue the boot process:
What happens if instead of forcing a boot you do what it says: run fsck
without the -a or -o options?
>
> EXT3-fs warning: mounting fs with errors. running e2fsck is recommended
> EXT3 FS on dm-4, internal journal
> EXT3-FS: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
> ... same for all mounts (same for dm-3, dm-2, dm-1, dm-0)
>
> EXT3-fs error (device dm-1) in ext3_reserve_inode_write: Journal has aborted
> EXT3-fs error (device dm-1) in ext3_orphan)write: Journal has aborted
> EXT3-fs error (device dm-1) in ext3_orphan_del: Journal has aborted
> EXT3-fs error (device dm-1) in ext3_truncate_write: Journal has aborted
> ext3_abort called.
> EXT3-fs error (device dm-1): ext3_journal)_start_sb: Detected aborte
> djournal
> Remounting filesystem read-only
>
> and finally I get tons of these:
>
> dm-0: rw-9, want=6447188432, limit=10485760
> attempt to access beyond end of device
>
> the system then stops for a long time (~5 minutes) at "starting systlog
> service" but eventually the login prompt comes up, and I can log in, see all
> my data, and even (to my surprise) write to the partitions on md1...
>
...which probably corrupts the fs even more.
> what the hell is going on here? thanks a lot in advance for any help!
>
What is going on is that you started with a simple booting error that
has propogated into filesystem errors. Those errors are compounded by
forcing a mount of a filesystem with errors . Remember that the system
that starts LVM and raid itself exists on the disks....
What you need is a shell with the root fs either totally unmounted or
mounted ro. Does booting single-user work? What about telling the
kernel init=/bin/sh? From there, you can check the status of the mds
with:
#/sbin/mdadm -D /dev/md0
#/sbin/mdadm -D /dev/md1
...
check the status of the logical volumes:
#/sbin/lvdisplay [lvname]
and then check the filesystems with:
#/sbin/e2fsck -f -c -c /dev/...
Only once you get the filesystems fully functional should you attempt to
boot further.
Doug.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References:
- mounting LVM partitions fails after etch upgrade
- From: David Fuchs
- Re: mounting LVM partitions fails after etch upgrade
- From: Douglas Allan Tutty
- mounting LVM partitions fails after etch upgrade
- Prev by Date: Re: Touchpad speed
- Next by Date: pdflatex from TeXLive produces much bigger pdf-file than in teTeX?
- Previous by thread: Re: mounting LVM partitions fails after etch upgrade
- Next by thread: Re: mounting LVM partitions fails after etch upgrade
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
