Re: I am ANGRY with Debian.



On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 01:56:03AM +0000, Tyler Smith wrote:
On 2007-05-31, Kevin Mark <kevin.mark@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

About a year ago, there was a GR (general resolution) that Debian had
and it said 'GFDL without invariant sections' are DFSG-free while 'GFDL
with invariant sections' is not. Read info on the vote.

That's all fine and good, and I've been persuaded to see the Debian
perspective on this. However, there would be fewer angry users if the
package maintainers put the non-DFSG stuff into non-free _before_ they
excised it from main.


Put it in non-free and put it as suggests by the main package.
Otherwise, one has no way of knowing when installing a package that it
doesn't come with useful documentation (which I believe breaks the
spirit of debian policy). I especially hate man pages that basically
tell nothing about the program and say something to the effect "this
man page was written for debian because the origional package did not
include a man page and we want to avoid bug reports". A useless man
page is still a bug in my book.

Instead of focusing on having more and more packages, we should be
focusing on the quality of what we've already got. Such quality would
include quality docs. Documentation seems to be the bane of many/most
free/open software distros.

Doug.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Poll results: User views on the FDL issue
    ... >> Sometimes having invariant sections protects a user's right to see ... > Debian explicitly considers the ability to modify and reuse a work to ... valuable to Debian. ... I think there are times where GFDL protected documents are ...
    (Debian-User)
  • Re: I am ANGRY with Debian.
    ... and it said 'GFDL without invariant sections' are DFSG-free while 'GFDL ... with invariant sections' is not. ... and I've been persuaded to see the Debian ... To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ...
    (Debian-User)
  • Re: emacs manual and other missing info
    ... repositories leaves me vulnerable to the GFDL policy of the moment. ... as you mention, from my understanding, GFDL licensed document without ... invariant sections are DFSG free. ... And if a package has the GFDL ...
    (Debian-User)
  • Re: I am ANGRY with Debian.
    ... and it said 'GFDL without invariant sections' are DFSG-free while 'GFDL ... with invariant sections' is not. ... and I've been persuaded to see the Debian ... To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ...
    (Debian-User)
  • Re: I am ANGRY with Debian.
    ... and it said 'GFDL without invariant sections' are DFSG-free while 'GFDL ... with invariant sections' is not. ... and I've been persuaded to see the Debian ... If you look at the bug track I sent you'll see that packagers are ...
    (Debian-User)