Re: I am ANGRY with Debian.
- From: Nic James Ferrier <nferrier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 14:22:05 +0100
"Karl E. Jorgensen" <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
"An alternative"? Re-writing the Emacs manual (IIRC this was the
sticking point early on in this thread) is not an easy task. At the
very least I would expect this to take some time. In the mean time, the
maintainer(s) still had to follow the DFSG and whatnot, so I cannot see
what choice they had...
An alternative action would have been to move bash-doc, emacs and
other packages that are going to be altered by this decision to
non-free rather than removing the documentation and leaving us with
none.
That seems like a perfectly reasonable course of action given the
circumstances.
I just can't understand why people think it's reasonable to just take
the documentation away. It's dogmatic in the extreeme.
--
Nic Ferrier
http://www.tapsellferrier.co.uk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: I am ANGRY with Debian.
- From: Tyler Smith
- Re: I am ANGRY with Debian.
- References:
- I am ANGRY with Debian.
- From: Nic James Ferrier
- Re: I am ANGRY with Debian.
- From: Max Hyre
- Re: I am ANGRY with Debian.
- From: Michael Marsh
- Re: I am ANGRY with Debian.
- From: Nic James Ferrier
- Re: I am ANGRY with Debian.
- From: Karl E. Jorgensen
- I am ANGRY with Debian.
- Prev by Date: Re: How do I listen to radio?
- Next by Date: grub
- Previous by thread: Re: I am ANGRY with Debian.
- Next by thread: Re: I am ANGRY with Debian.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|