Re: RTF - proprietary or open?
- From: Paul Johnson <baloo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:58:17 -0700
John Hasler wrote in Article <87odj4vu77.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> posted to
gmane.linux.debian.user:
Alan Ianson writes:
I believe kword supports ODF now and I hope this will continue to be the
case with koffice and other word processing applications like abiword in
the future.
The problem is that most Microsoft Windows users cannot deal with ODF.
That doesn't matter to me but to some people it is critical.
I was unaware that openoffice.org was not freely available in win32 binary
form.
--
Paul Johnson
Email and IM (XMPP & Google Talk): baloo@xxxxxxxxx
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RTF - proprietary or open?
- From: Roberto C. Sánchez
- Re: RTF - proprietary or open?
- References:
- RTF - proprietary or open?
- From: Celejar
- Re: RTF - proprietary or open?
- From: Alan Ianson
- Re: RTF - proprietary or open?
- From: John Hasler
- RTF - proprietary or open?
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: QEMU Package faster
- Next by Date: Re: RTF - proprietary or open?
- Previous by thread: Re: RTF - proprietary or open?
- Next by thread: Re: RTF - proprietary or open?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|