Re: RTF - proprietary or open?
- From: Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 22:53:52 -0400
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 02:58:17PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
John Hasler wrote in Article <87odj4vu77.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> posted toThat depends on your definition of "available." If the person receiving
gmane.linux.debian.user:
Alan Ianson writes:
I believe kword supports ODF now and I hope this will continue to be the
case with koffice and other word processing applications like abiword in
the future.
The problem is that most Microsoft Windows users cannot deal with ODF.
That doesn't matter to me but to some people it is critical.
I was unaware that openoffice.org was not freely available in win32 binary
form.
your document is on dialup and not in a position to download the 100+ MB
OOo or is otherwise not sufficiently proficient to install software,
then you are basically left with "default" windows tools, which are
wordpad, and occasionally works or word.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- References:
- RTF - proprietary or open?
- From: Celejar
- Re: RTF - proprietary or open?
- From: Alan Ianson
- Re: RTF - proprietary or open?
- From: John Hasler
- Re: RTF - proprietary or open?
- From: Paul Johnson
- RTF - proprietary or open?
- Prev by Date: Re: RTF - proprietary or open?
- Next by Date: kernel modification and CONFIG_HIGHMEM issue
- Previous by thread: Re: RTF - proprietary or open?
- Next by thread: Re: RTF - proprietary or open?
- Index(es):