Re: OT: QEMU Package faster
- From: "Andrew J. Barr" <andrew.james.barr@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 01:15:19 -0400
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 00:59 -0400, Scott Gifford wrote:
Mike McCarty <Mike.McCarty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
[...]
I noticed that on her machine, QEMU does not eat lots of CPU, while
on my machine, it eats the machine. I've copied the exact raw image
disc from her machine to mine, but QEMU eats my CPU.
Perhaps it's a difference in processor features. Newer CPUs from
Intel and AMD contain special virtualization instructions that make
running a VM much easier, and somewhat faster. Maybe she has such a
chip and you don't?
Nope.
To take advantage of this you need KVM, which is a fork of qemu.
What's more these hardware instructions are in their early incarnations
and in many cases, given the horsepower of the machines featuring these
instructions, using traditional software-based virtualization
(VirtualBox, VMware, or qemu+kqemu) is smoother and faster.
----Scott.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References:
- Re: OT: QEMU Package faster
- From: Scott Gifford
- Re: OT: QEMU Package faster
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: QEMU Package faster
- Next by Date: dsc.py: Automated warnings for Debian security updates
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: QEMU Package faster
- Next by thread: Re: OT: QEMU Package faster
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|