Re: OT: QEMU Package faster
- From: Mike McCarty <Mike.McCarty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 17:11:25 -0500
Scott Gifford wrote:
Mike McCarty <Mike.McCarty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
[...]
I noticed that on her machine, QEMU does not eat lots of CPU, while
on my machine, it eats the machine. I've copied the exact raw image
disc from her machine to mine, but QEMU eats my CPU.
Perhaps it's a difference in processor features. Newer CPUs from
Intel and AMD contain special virtualization instructions that make
running a VM much easier, and somewhat faster. Maybe she has such a
chip and you don't?
My machine is newer and faster. Ours are both Celerons.
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
Oppose globalization and One World Governments like the UN.
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References:
- Re: OT: QEMU Package faster
- From: Scott Gifford
- Re: OT: QEMU Package faster
- Prev by Date: Re: need good file explorer
- Next by Date: Re: Opera is faster, but...
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: QEMU Package faster
- Next by thread: dsc.py: Automated warnings for Debian security updates
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|