Re: [OT] revision control: git vs mercurial as replacement for bzr
- From: bob@xxxxxxxxxx (Bob Proulx)
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 17:14:37 -0600
Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
[I don't want to start a flame; just to investigate which application is
best for my particular purpose. No offence intended to anyone.]
Almost impossible in a public forum.
You might want to look at this reference which compares features.
http://better-scm.berlios.de/comparison/comparison.html
This is a quite dated now article but still interesting read:
http://www.dwheeler.com/essays/scm.html
I am slightly leaning towards mercurial, because it is available for
potential collaborators with MS's OS. Most of all however, I want the
tool that is powerful and efficient (both usage, time and space).
I use Git daily and find it to be quite a good performer. It is very
fast. For most of the strange corner case behaviors it seems to get
more of them Right(TM) than other systems. YMMV.
Bob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References:
- [OT] revision control: git vs mercurial as replacement for bzr
- From: Johannes Wiedersich
- [OT] revision control: git vs mercurial as replacement for bzr
- Prev by Date: Re: Migrate debian services to a new debian system
- Next by Date: Re: upgrading ubuntu to debian
- Previous by thread: [OT] revision control: git vs mercurial as replacement for bzr
- Next by thread: How to bind keys to commands, without requiring login?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|