Re: unstable: problems installing GNOME
- From: Florian Kulzer <florian.kulzer+debian@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 22:45:45 +0200
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 15:06:02 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 09/24/07 14:15, Florian Kulzer wrote:
[snip]
The first Gnome 2.20 packages have entered unstable; the current mix of
version 2.18 and 2.20 does not seem to be installable.
However, right now it might still be enough to simply add a "testing"
repository to your sources.list. Apt should be able to pull in the
missing 2.18 packages from Lenny.
As of now (2007-09-24 20:04 UTC), GNOME 2.20 in Sid seems totally
installable except for libwnck.
But doesn't Gnome depend on that? I thought that was what the OP's
dependency problems came down to. Does he have to switch manually from
libwnck18 to libwnck22? Or should he just have waited a few more hours?
(I currently see a mix of roughly 2/3 Gnome 2.20 and 1/3 Gnome 2.18
packages, but maybe my mirror is just lagging behind a bit.)
--
Regards, | http://users.icfo.es/Florian.Kulzer
Florian |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: unstable: problems installing GNOME
- From: michael
- Re: unstable: problems installing GNOME
- References:
- unstable: problems installing GNOME
- From: michael
- Re: unstable: problems installing GNOME
- From: Florian Kulzer
- Re: unstable: problems installing GNOME
- From: Ron Johnson
- unstable: problems installing GNOME
- Prev by Date: trying to get the windows icq program QQ to work under etch
- Next by Date: Re: Dist-upgrade Mess of Sid--mplayer?
- Previous by thread: Re: unstable: problems installing GNOME
- Next by thread: Re: unstable: problems installing GNOME
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
