Re: efficiency of windows managers
- From: "Manu Hack" <manuhack@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 21:43:00 -0400
On 9/28/07, Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@xxxxxxx> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 09/28/07 17:21, Manu Hack wrote:
[snip]
Yeah, will do if I have the time. But at the moment I'm very happy
with xfce4.4 (fast and with the real transparency stuff). :)
What's the benefit of transparency?
Not much. And I'm not saying xfce4.4 is good only because of the transparency.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References:
- efficiency of windows managers
- From: Manu Hack
- Re: efficiency of windows managers
- From: Andy
- Re: efficiency of windows managers
- From: Manu Hack
- Re: efficiency of windows managers
- From: Andrew Sackville-West
- Re: efficiency of windows managers
- From: Manu Hack
- Re: efficiency of windows managers
- From: Ron Johnson
- efficiency of windows managers
- Prev by Date: Re: efficiency of windows managers
- Next by Date: Re: Nspluginwrapper on AMD64
- Previous by thread: Re: efficiency of windows managers
- Next by thread: Re: efficiency of windows managers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
