Re: mdadm, partitioned array
- From: "Douglas A. Tutty" <dtutty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 20:02:30 -0400
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 07:59:35PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach michael@xxxxxxxxx <michael@xxxxxxxxx> [2007.10.09.0611 +0100]:
also sprach Douglas A. Tutty <dtutty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2007.10.09.1718 +0100]:
LVM is perfect.
You wish. :)
OK, nothing in any OS is perfect and Linux LVM isn't either. Sure there
are some _features_ that some have wished for. There's probably some
bugs. I haven't noticed any.
I didn't see any _partition_ option on Etch's installer. If you want
partitions of a raid device, it looks like you need to mark it for use
with LVM.
So other than wishlist items for more features, what's wrong with LVM as
it stands now? Is there any reason not to use it? Is it better to use
cfdisk on it?
Doug.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: mdadm, partitioned array
- From: martin f krafft
- Re: mdadm, partitioned array
- References:
- mdadm, partitioned array
- From: michael
- Re: mdadm, partitioned array
- From: Douglas A. Tutty
- Re: mdadm, partitioned array
- From: michael
- Re: mdadm, partitioned array
- From: michael
- Re: mdadm, partitioned array
- From: martin f krafft
- mdadm, partitioned array
- Prev by Date: Re: gnome alarm clock / egg timer?
- Next by Date: Re: mdadm, partitioned array
- Previous by thread: Re: mdadm, partitioned array
- Next by thread: Re: mdadm, partitioned array
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|