Re: Silly question: Where's eth0?

On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 08:48:39PM +0100, Joe wrote:
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:

Now, if you actually had a piece of hardware that _was_ fully supported
by the linux kernel without this mess, then you would get a functioning
eth0 which would then work just fine with the standard Debian networking
tools. In short, your problem isn't with the networking tools, its with a
non-functional driver.

Looks like my last post didn't make it here. I had a solid, dependable
working MB NIC until a couple of weeks ago, when Sid suddenly started
renaming it to eth1 during boot (without explanation) and then saying eth0
didn't exist. I didn't notice (not exactly the kind of thing you expect),
disabled it and installed a PCI card, then when that didn't work, had to
alter my interfaces file to eth1. I think the MB NIC is probably not
faulty, but I'm short of time at the moment and it isn't urgent.

Not exactly standard Debian behaviour, or at least it wasn't once.

well. I'm silly for jumping into this, but the important word above is
'Sid'.

I suspect that's 'nuff said. :)

A

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Silly question: Wheres eth0?
    ... eth0 which would then work just fine with the standard Debian networking ... Not exactly standard Debian behaviour, or at least it wasn't once. ... There's probably some way to get udev to be consistant with device ... To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ...
    (Debian-User)
  • Re: Silly question: Wheres eth0?
    ... by the linux kernel without this mess, then you would get a functioning ... eth0 which would then work just fine with the standard Debian networking ... Not exactly standard Debian behaviour, or at least it wasn't once. ... I think there is pretty good persistent netowrk interface naming at ...
    (Debian-User)