Re: Apt-Get or Aptitude
- From: Nate Duehr <nate@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:05:53 -0600
On Oct 29, 2007, at 6:00 PM, Celejar wrote:
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 00:14:18 -0600
Nate Duehr <nate@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Oct 28, 2007, at 11:06 AM, Daniel Burrows wrote:
[snip]
I'd say the main difference is that apt-get is a command-line tool,
whereas aptitude is an interactive tool that can be driven from the
command-line.
I would disagree. Aptitude supports command-line operation as well as
interactive.
You do realize that Daniel is both the author and maintainer of
aptitude :) ?
Nope.
I guess he forgot that you can drive aptitude just fine from the command line? ;-)
[Thanks, Daniel, for your Debian, aptitude and d-u work!]
Yep. Good job. Aptitude walks the dog, compared to apt-get.
I'm an old dselect guy who "migrated" to aptitude.
It's good stuff.
--
Nate Duehr
nate@xxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References:
- Apt-Get or Aptitude
- From: Jeff Grossman
- Re: Apt-Get or Aptitude
- From: Amit Uttamchandani
- Re: Apt-Get or Aptitude
- From: Daniel Burrows
- Re: Apt-Get or Aptitude
- From: Nate Duehr
- Re: Apt-Get or Aptitude
- From: Celejar
- Apt-Get or Aptitude
- Prev by Date: Re: Apt-Get or Aptitude
- Next by Date: mydns-mysql installation problem
- Previous by thread: Re: Apt-Get or Aptitude
- Next by thread: Re: Apt-Get or Aptitude
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
