Re: reverting to 'standard' etch installation
- From: Andrei Popescu <andreimpopescu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 06:02:44 +0200
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 10:11:00AM -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
5.
Now, anything else in the list are packages from stable that got
upgraded to unstable as part of installing gnomad2 (things that
gnomad2 required at a higher version than things in stable).
One at a time, find the same package name in the regular section
and see what depends on it and see if you have anything. Then,
mark for removal the package in obsolete, mark the stable
package for install and mark it for automatic.
You could also press Enter to open the package description. At the
bottom you can see all available versions. If all you have in
sources.list is etch you shouldn't see more than 2 (the installed
unstable one and the etch one). Marking the etch version for install
should mark the other one for removal.
Regards,
Andrei
--
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
(Albert Einstein)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: reverting to 'standard' etch installation
- From: Richard Lyons
- Re: reverting to 'standard' etch installation
- Prev by Date: dictd local server secure?
- Next by Date: Re: Etch 2.6.18-5-486 stable but 2.6.18-5-686 crashes on PIII SMP???
- Previous by thread: dictd local server secure?
- Next by thread: Re: reverting to 'standard' etch installation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|