Re: Preferred Backup Method?
- From: "Douglas A. Tutty" <dtutty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 09:52:09 -0500
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 03:22:48PM -0800, David Brodbeck wrote:
What's your experience with rdiff-backup been? When I tried it I
found it way too fragile to be a viable backup solution. If the
backup was interrupted for any reason, it would corrupt the history
data, and all future backup or restore attempts in that directory
would cause rdiff-backup to crash. Also, it had the usual Python
error recovery problems -- whenever an error occurred the actual
error message was buried somewhere in a gargantuan stack trace.
Please don't call this the "Usual Python error recovery problems".
Python allows you to trap all the errors it could discover. You just
have to wrap everything in a try block. So if you're getting error
messages in a stack trace, then call it a bug.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Preferred Backup Method?
- From: David Brodbeck
- Re: Preferred Backup Method?
- References:
- Preferred Backup Method?
- From: Michael Pobega
- Re: Preferred Backup Method?
- From: Andrew Sackville-West
- Re: Preferred Backup Method?
- From: David Brodbeck
- Preferred Backup Method?
- Prev by Date: Re: Preferred Backup Method?
- Next by Date: Re: Restore menus after FS problem
- Previous by thread: Re: Preferred Backup Method?
- Next by thread: Re: Preferred Backup Method?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|