Re: Question about - "The following packages have been kept back:"



On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 08:08:58PM +0100, Robert Cates wrote:
Hi all,



I've got a general question concerning apt-get - what would be the reason(s)
for the below message when I upgrade my packages?

That message mean that a newer version of the package is available but
for some reason it won't be installed. Usually it's because some
dependency hasn't been upgraded yet. For whatever reason your system
is in a state that prevents that package from being upgraded. You can
usually tell by looking at the packages dependencies and compare them
to what is currently installed.

Do I need to do an
apt-get upgrade again at a later time, or is there something I need to do
right away to get it to install?

you could dist-upgrade -- that allows more aggressive package handling
to avoid these issues.

I somehow was wondering if it's because
the package maintainer does not have the package quite ready for an
upgrade.

no. likely some dependency isn't quite ready and thus hasn't been
released yet.




The following packages have been kept back:

linux-image-2.6-686


hmmm... I'm not sure what would keep a kernel from upgrading. I've not
seen that in my recollection.

A

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature



Relevant Pages

  • Live upgrade from FC5 to FC6 successful, FC7 next
    ... Then just run yum upgrade. ... There were only 5 dependency failures. ... Error: Missing Dependency: libgcj.so.7 is needed by package eclipse-pydev ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: Im having troubles upgrading from FC5 to FC6 using yum
    ... I've tried a couple of iterations of upgrading my Fedora Core 5 machine ... --> Finished Dependency Resolution ... package mozilla-mail ... If mplayer did not upgrade, ...
    (linux.redhat)
  • Re: APT::Default-Release doesnt seem to affect upgrades
    ... Maybe there is an upgrade that depends on an uninstalled package that ... apt-get upgrade does nothing ... apt-get -t unstable upgrade pulls in lots ...
    (Debian-User)
  • Re: cold plug with udev
    ... unless there is a dependency problem or it's marked as held. ... to be kept behind if installing it would mean either installing a new ... I don't see that either of those would prevent upgrade. ... removal of some other package and doing so would break another package. ...
    (uk.comp.os.linux)
  • Apt-get upgrade problems
    ... I have a strange problem with apt-get. ... Reading Package Lists... ... Calculating Upgrade... ... update it seems to get the new package lists but no effect when trying ...
    (Debian-User)