Re: What am I missing without mutt?
- From: BartlebyScrivener <bscrivener42@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 14:56:30 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 4, 4:20 pm, "Dotan Cohen" <dotanco...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sure, for plain text OOo and Word are terrible tools. They are not
meant for that purpose. However, when you need markup such as that for
print documents, a word processor is a necessity.
A necessity? Only if you don't know LaTeX.
But I think you see my point. For a text and keyboard person, mutt is
much more efficient. To me using Thunderbird to send email is like
trying to manage text with a word processor.
To pick up on your analogy. Mutt is made for the purpose of managing
and sending plain text emails. If that's what you want to do, then
it's much more efficient and programmable than a gui email program
like Thunderbird.
Just my opinion.
RD
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What am I missing without mutt?
- From: Dotan Cohen
- Re: What am I missing without mutt?
- References:
- What am I missing without mutt?
- From: Dotan Cohen
- Re: What am I missing without mutt?
- From: Jochen Schulz
- Re: What am I missing without mutt?
- From: Dotan Cohen
- Re: What am I missing without mutt?
- From: BartlebyScrivener
- Re: What am I missing without mutt?
- From: Dotan Cohen
- What am I missing without mutt?
- Prev by Date: Re: What am I missing without mutt?
- Next by Date: Re: dist-upgrade from sarge to etch - package dependencies issues
- Previous by thread: Re: What am I missing without mutt?
- Next by thread: Re: What am I missing without mutt?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
