Re: Security update of etch did not update my Kernel. Still vulnerable. Why???
- From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 13:52:50 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 03/09/08 13:40, Mitchell Laks wrote:
On 13:57 Sun 09 Mar , Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
Do you have the linus-image-2.6 meta-package installed? If you only
have an actual linux-image deb installed, it will never be upgraded.
The meta-package will always depend on the most recent version and will
be updated at the time that the new version is added to the repository.
The "standard" way of handling this is to use aptitude to install the
linux-image-2.6 meta-package which will bring in everything upon which
it depends. Once you are running the new kernel without errors, you can
start to remove older kernels manually from within aptitude.
I use apt not aptitude ( :( ). I am used to it.
When I try to do
apt-get install linux-image-2.6 it tell me that it is a virtual package
provided by (the long list of packages).
" You should explicitly select one to install ".
It does not give me the option of selecting the virtual package....
I did apt-get dist-upgrade and then explicitly installed the
linux-image-2.6.18-6-486 to get upgraded.
This followed the instructions of Graham. Thank you Graham.
Is there some way to get the virtual package loaded using apt
so that the security kernel upgrade will be automatic?
Every time I see that kind of message, I just pick the "real" base
package that I want.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
"The kniiife..., the kniiife... The life of the wife is ended
by the kni-ife."
Stewie Griffin & Eliza Pinchley
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFH1DIBS9HxQb37XmcRAur+AKCzYOv9gKNETcB1OskLA8EooxtGAwCggHVQ
0bD7j/5mdHr0QIVo7iParsw=
=0aj5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Security update of etch did not update my Kernel. Still vulnerable. Why???
- From: Douglas A. Tutty
- Re: Security update of etch did not update my Kernel. Still vulnerable. Why???
- From: Mitchell Laks
- Re: Security update of etch did not update my Kernel. Still vulnerable. Why???
- References:
- Security update of etch did not update my Kernel. Still vulnerable. Why???
- From: Mitchell Laks
- Re: Security update of etch did not update my Kernel. Still vulnerable. Why???
- From: Douglas A. Tutty
- Re: Security update of etch did not update my Kernel. Still vulnerable. Why???
- From: Mitchell Laks
- Security update of etch did not update my Kernel. Still vulnerable. Why???
- Prev by Date: Re: German characters in English locale
- Next by Date: Re: Security update of etch did not update my Kernel. Still vulnerable. Why???
- Previous by thread: Re: Security update of etch did not update my Kernel. Still vulnerable. Why???
- Next by thread: Re: Security update of etch did not update my Kernel. Still vulnerable. Why???
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|