Re: most lightweight debian server
- From: Mark Allums <mark@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 09:54:30 -0500
Mark Allums wrote:
paragasu wrote:
i will love to find out all the option available. I just one to ask one more thing. i hope it
is not too much. Isn't the kernel have modular support. able to load and unload the
needed and unneeded modules on the fly?
How much is the improvement compare to the strip down version of kernel compared
to the modular version in term of performance? (i know disk space is out of question,
strip down produce small kernel size)
Stripped down will generally be about the same or possibly faster. However, using alternative options, like the I/O scheduler example, will affect your performance, mostly negatively. The kernel has been optimized for performance already; making drastic changes may result in a slower kernel.
You can also configure the kernel for the architecture, e.g. generic i686 vs. Athlon 64 vs. Core 2. A kernel compiled for Athlon 64 will run faster on an Athlon 64 than it will on a Core 2. A kernel compiled for the Core 2 will run faster on a Core 2 than a kernel compiled for generic i686 will run on the same Core 2.
Just more examples.
Memory vs. speed is often a tradeoff. Faster = more memory, usually.
--
Mark Allums
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References:
- most lightweight debian server
- From: paragasu
- Re: most lightweight debian server
- From: Douglas A. Tutty
- Re: most lightweight debian server
- From: paragasu
- Re: most lightweight debian server
- From: Ron Johnson
- Re: most lightweight debian server
- From: Mark Allums
- Re: most lightweight debian server
- From: paragasu
- Re: most lightweight debian server
- From: Mark Allums
- Re: most lightweight debian server
- From: paragasu
- Re: most lightweight debian server
- From: Mark Allums
- Re: most lightweight debian server
- From: paragasu
- Re: most lightweight debian server
- From: Mark Allums
- most lightweight debian server
- Prev by Date: Re: Dovecot and Resolvconf issues
- Next by Date: Re: Sendmail configuration
- Previous by thread: Re: most lightweight debian server
- Next by thread: Re: most lightweight debian server
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
- Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrews dream :-))
... And the rate of change in each major portion of the kernel (drivers, ... arch,
core, network, etc) is exactly proportional to the amount of the ... and we also tried
to simply even re-architect the whole tree so ... And we fix them up, ...
(Linux-Kernel) - Re: WTF: Stack Size 4k
... > hell are those of us who use and love the SCSI boards based on the ...
> kernel with the 8k stack size by choosing to not allow that as an option ... I, for
one, see great folly in upgrading ANY datacenter to Fedora Core 2 ... (Fedora) - Re: Processor type kernel option for Core Duo (not Core 2)
... >> I've got a Centrino Core Duo laptop; ... >> can't work out which
processor type option to use for the kernel. ... the CPU type selection within the kernel
configuration (make ... > hardware and the software support. ... (comp.os.linux.setup) - Re: read() returns ETIMEDOUT on steady TCP connection
... It's relatively simple at its core -- readfrom an inbound connection and writeto outbound
sockets. ... I've traced the source of the ETIMEDOUT within the kernel to ... but
it seems to implies that it's reaching a limit of a number of retransmits of sending ACKs on the
TCP connection receiving the inbound data? ... (freebsd-net) - Re: Fedora Core 3 Kernel 2.6.12-1.1381_FC3
... I'm having a problem with Fedora Core 3. ... But all my other clients
are on the latest ... kernel 2.6.12-1.1387 so I would like to update this one as well.
... fine but when I upgrade the kernel it seems like it can't see the disk at all. ...
(Fedora)