Re: Inconsistent state in util-linux
- From: Joey Hess <joeyh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 13:49:13 -0400
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
/usr/local/share/perl/5.8.8/Errno.pm is not part of Debian. Get rid of
Well, the sysadmin should be able to put whatever they want in
/usr/local without messing up debian automated systems. Why is apt or
grub or whatever trying to run perl from /usr/local? If it needs a
specific version of perl, why is it not using the proper full path?
By installing a file in /usr/local/share/perl/<version>/ , you are
telling perl "hey, if you're version <version> of perl, here is a nice
file that I went out of my way to locally install for you. So use it
instead of the file that is included in your regular package. Because I
asked you to, nicely. TIA. Oh, and if the file is bad, please still use
it, and blow up in arbitrary ways. Because I asked you to use it, and I
know better than you."
--
see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Inconsistent state in util-linux
- From: Mumia W..
- Re: Inconsistent state in util-linux
- References:
- Inconsistent state in util-linux
- From: Rob Wright
- Re: Inconsistent state in util-linux
- From: Florian Kulzer
- Re: Inconsistent state in util-linux
- From: Douglas A. Tutty
- Re: Inconsistent state in util-linux
- From: Joey Hess
- Re: Inconsistent state in util-linux
- From: Douglas A. Tutty
- Inconsistent state in util-linux
- Prev by Date: Re: Alsa configuration
- Next by Date: Re: Debian or Ubuntu?
- Previous by thread: Re: Inconsistent state in util-linux
- Next by thread: Re: Inconsistent state in util-linux
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|