Re: Debian secure by default?
- From: Raj Kiran Grandhi <grajkiran@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 06:42:57 +0530
Rico Secada wrote:
Hi.
Why is Debian not setup to be secure be default?
Not everyone is a security expert so imho the system should be fully
secured out-of-the-box.
Please elaborate on what you consider to be the insecure parts of a default installation. Describe a process by which an etch system can be compromised remotely. Obviously, the ability to become root by tweaking the boot parameters from the grub screen does not count as a vulnerability.
--
Raj Kiran Grandhi
--
Politics is for the moment. An equation is for eternity.
-- Albert Einstein
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Debian secure by default?
- From: Rico Secada
- Re: Debian secure by default?
- From: Rico Secada
- Re: Debian secure by default?
- From: lostson
- Re: Debian secure by default?
- References:
- Debian secure by default?
- From: Rico Secada
- Debian secure by default?
- Prev by Date: Re: apt-get dist-upgrade failure
- Next by Date: Re: vmplayer installer cannot find libs (amd64)
- Previous by thread: Re: Debian secure by default?
- Next by thread: Re: Debian secure by default?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
