Re: Debian secure by default?
- From: Rico Secada <coolzone@xxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 10:40:05 +0200
On Sat, 17 May 2008 06:42:57 +0530
Raj Kiran Grandhi <grajkiran@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Rico Secada wrote:
Hi.
Why is Debian not setup to be secure be default?
Not everyone is a security expert so imho the system should be fully
secured out-of-the-box.
Please elaborate on what you consider to be the insecure parts of a
default installation. Describe a process by which an etch system can
be compromised remotely. Obviously, the ability to become root by
tweaking the boot parameters from the grub screen does not count as a
vulnerability.
All I am saying is that it shouldn't be needed to harden anything.
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/
--
Raj Kiran Grandhi
--
Politics is for the moment. An equation is for eternity.
-- Albert Einstein
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Debian secure by default?
- From: Paul Johnson
- Re: Debian secure by default?
- From: Magnus Therning
- Re: Debian secure by default?
- References:
- Debian secure by default?
- From: Rico Secada
- Re: Debian secure by default?
- From: Raj Kiran Grandhi
- Debian secure by default?
- Prev by Date: Re: Debian secure by default?
- Next by Date: Re: Debian secure by default?
- Previous by thread: Re: Debian secure by default?
- Next by thread: Re: Debian secure by default?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|